As a person of Venezuelan heritage, I share this post with sorrow. The world needs to know about what is happening there. Warning – there are some graphic photos. ”Venezolanos somos todo.”
By Grace Alano. Grace Alano is an immigration attorney at The Law Offices of Grace R. Alano in San Francisco, CA. Find Grace Alano on Google+
As an immigration attorney who assists clients with fiance visas and marriage-based green cards, I am sometimes asked to give advice on wedding venues and even the nuts and bolts of obtaining a marriage license and marriage certificate. My fiance visa clients must also plan weddings without really being able to plan them ahead of time. Those entering the U.S. on fiance visas must marry within 90 days. They also can’t predict when they will actually get their visas. So oftentimes, the couple will plan a small civil wedding, and sometimes follow up with a big vow renewal with all their loved ones from across the country and around the world at a later date. I often tell them that these small weddings are my favorite. Whether it was a Scottish bride wearing a red column dress and fascinator and groom wearing a kilt at City Hall; an outdoor wedding at the courthouse in Marin County; a lovely small luncheon reception at a favorite restaurant or friend’s house; or a wedding at the beach with flower in hair officiated by a friend, small weddings are often the sweetest. They can beat the 450-guest wedding with the cotton candy Cinderella wedding dress any day in my book. All you need is love and a little panache. In the spirit of lovely small weddings, I’ve created a Pinterest board with ideas for my fiance visa clients and hope you find it helpful: Grace Alano’s Wedding Pinterest Board.
By Grace Alano. Grace Alano is an immigration attorney at The Law Offices of Grace R. Alano in San Francisco, CA. Find Grace Alano on Google+
The Supreme Court has struck down the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, which barred the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage. The law was seen as a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution. The decision does not change any laws regarding whether same-sex couples can marry, but rather determines whether they can receive federal benefits that apply to heterosexual couples.
“The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity,” Justice Kennedy wrote. “By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others.
“This does open the door for bi-national same-sex couples to be treated equally under the law. That means that comprehensive immigration reform probably need not include a provision specifically tailored to making sure bi-national partners of same-sex couples can get visas automatically, the same as opposite-sex partners. As Paul Smith, a partner at Jenner & Block and arguably the leading gay rights litigator in the country (he won Lawrence v. Texas, overturning state bans on gay sex), told me, “My understanding is that the elimination of DOMA would by itself mean that all bi-national married couples would have the same rights, whether same sex or not.”
I had been holding my breath for the last several days, anxiously awaiting the decision and cried some happy tears this morning. It is going to affect many couples that I have been working with. I will continue to monitor the news and what the decision means for immigration.
By Grace Alano
Note to the reader: this interview took place before the Senate approved the comprehensive immigration reform bill without the amendment that would have allowed LGBT U.S. citizens to file immigrant visa petitions for same-sex spouses. Gay advocacy groups still endeavor to bring the amendment as a stand-alone bill, although it will likely be difficult to pass. Also, many are hoping that DOMA will be repealed and that the tide will continue to turn in favor of equality for all families. That is why we still want to get the story across.
There has been some controversy in the immigration community lately with regards to the inclusion of benefits for same-sex partners of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. Many feel that inclusion of LGBT rights in the Senate’s comprehensive immigration reform bill will, in effect, kill it. A colleague has written a wonderful op-ed in favor of LGBT inclusion, and I agree completely.
A source of inspiration and knowledge for LGBT activism in immigration is my colleague, Okan Sengun. I decided to interview him to get the latest news on what is happening with LGBT inclusion in comprehensive immigration reform and LGBT rights in immigration in general.
Hi Okan, can you tell us a little bit about yourself and your role as an activist for the LGBT community?
I was born and raised in Turkey and moved to the United States in 2008. When I first moved to San Francisco, I started volunteering at Under One Roof, a store benefiting HIV/AIDS organizations, in the Castro to get involved with the LGBT community. It helped me see the sense of community in San Francisco, which I didn’t have in my hometown. At U.C. Hastings, I also got involved in OUTLAW, a LGBT student organization. After the bar exam, I started working at an organization that assists LGBT refugees from the Middle East. Before that, I was not aware of issues such as honor killings and the death penalties of different countries for being gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. That experience just opened my eyes. The same year I also worked at the Castro CBD (Community Benefit District), a small, local non-profit, where we provided information about the Castro and its history to visitors. That helped me learn more about Harvey Milk, the gay rights movement in the 70′s and 80′s as well as the AIDS epidemic. Now, I am a panel attorney at the AIDS Legal Referral Panel, which assists people living with HIV and AIDS with legal services. I also volunteer for the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights. They have an amazing asylum program for LGBT immigrants, where they match pro bono attorneys with clients as well as the same attorneys with immigration mentors. This year, I also serve as the LGBT Coordinator of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) Northern California Chapter.
What I love the most about the community here is that the people here whether gay, straight, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, young, or old are very supportive for LGBT rights. And they are so accepting, which is different than my hometown. Since December 2011, I have been exclusively practicing immigration law and have been following up on CIR (Comprehensive Immigration Reform).
What is happening now with same sex-partnership and comprehensive immigration reform?
Under current immigration laws, same-sex binational couples cannot enjoy the same rights that heterosexual couples do. A U.S. citizen cannot apply for immigration benefits for his or her same-sex partner, even if they are legally married in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage. So there ends up being a lot of pressure on the U.S. citizen spouse, because he or she needs to choose between his or her country and partner. In most cases, U.S. citizens choose their partners and live in exile in other countries. There is a great book called “Torn Apart United by Love, Divided by Law” that shares stories of same-sex binational couples who are facing DOMA’s discrimination. The U.S. citizens have to sell their properties in the U.S., move to other countries and set up new lives just to be able to live with their partners. According to a survey done by UCLA in 2010, 35,000 individuals are adversely affected by the current discriminatory immigration laws. Half of these couples raise U.S. citizen children.
When the comprehensive immigration reform bill was first introduced by the bipartisan Gang of 8 on April 17, it didn’t include any protection for same-sex couples. Since then, immigrant advocates and immigration attorneys have been pushing for LGBT inclusion at events such as the National Day of Action in Washington, D.C., and raising their voices.
After the introduction of the Senate immigration bill, Senator Patrick Leahy, the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, filed two proposed amendments to the bill that would benefit LGBT binational families. One amendment is to include the Uniting American Families Act (“UAFA”), which would allow permanent partners of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents to obtain lawful permanent resident status in the same manner as spouses of citizens and lawful permanent residents.
The second amendment was to recognize any marriage entered into in full compliance with the laws of the State or foreign country wherein such marriage was performed. So if you are married in Iowa or Massachusetts or anywhere it’s legal, your marriage is deemed valid for immigration purposes and the U.S. citizen spouse would be able to petition for his or her same-sex spouse for immigration benefits. I just hope that these amendments will make their way onto the immigration bill.
What about the Prop 8 and DOMA cases? What are your thoughts on them?
I believe the decisions in these two historic cases would benefit the LGBT community, which is great. However, I am not sure whether the LGBT immigrant community would benefit from any of the upcoming decisions. I do not think the Supreme Court would issue a broad ruling that would allow federal benefits to same-sex couples.
Therefore, we cannot completely depend on the U.S. Supreme court where there are five Republicans and four Democrats to render the decisions. That is why we have been advocating and calling the senators to push for the LGBT inclusion.
The U.S. Supreme Court most probably will rule on these two cases toward the end of this June, which is generally known as PRIDE month. This year AILA Northern California is marching in the San Francisco Pride parade, which is on Sunday, June 30th, to show the immigration attorneys’ support for the LGBT community. This year is especially important because of all that is going on.
What do you hope can be accomplished in politics and society in the next few years with regards to LGBT rights?
After Senator Leahy’s filing of the two amendments, the Republican senators in the Gang of 8 said that if there is LGBT inclusion, they will not support the bill anymore. They used the term “killing the bill” and believe that such an inclusion will, in fact, kill the bill, even though President Obama is supportive of LGBT inclusion in the bill. President Obama also said that he would sign any immigration bill, whether or not it includes relief for same-sex families.
I strongly believe that all U.S. citizens should be treated equally under the immigration laws and regulations. Same sex families should be able to stay together, and U.S. citizens shouldn’t be forced to choose between their countries and families and their partners. The best case scenario is that the UAFA will become law in this country.
What can people do to help?
For the last couple of weeks, we have been calling Dianne Feinstein’s office everyday, telling her [staff] that we as AILA Northern California strongly urge Senator Feinstein to support the LGBT inclusion and to garner her support for same-sex families. Everyone should call their senators and tell them to support same-sex families. Telling stories of clients, or friends is also very effective. Immigration attorneys can have their clients contact their senators. The senators’ offices are very responsive and it only takes couple of minutes to tell them your message.
I learned to be vocal in this country. It’s important to raise your voice and inform others. Let your friends and family know what’s going on and what they can do to make the change in our society.
Okan Sengun is an immigration attorney at Owji Law Group. He can be reached at email@example.com or at 415-693-9583.
by Grace Alano
I grew up in Los Angeles and went to Disneyland often, so this video brings back fond memories. I also plan to take my daughter there for the first time this summer.
This video is 14 minutes long, so play it on your downtime or as background music while you surf the web. But it does go through the entire ride.
Which countries can you spot? If you were you born outside of the U.S., do you see your country? If you are a native-born American like me, can you spot the countries your parents are from? Or your grandparents or great-great grandparents? Or your ancestors if your family immigrated centuries ago? Or did you love the cowboy and Native American?
Which are your favorites? I have to say, I have always loved the Hawaii/Oceana part, complete with the little Filipina doll.
by Grace Alano
News agencies are revealing an advanced memo of the bipartisan group of Senator’s comprehensive immigration reform bill. THIS IS NOT THE BILL! THE BILL WILL BE HUNDREDS OF PAGES LONG AND IS NOT PUBLIC YET! Here are some possible key provisions being reported in the press:
- The cut-off date for those applying for Registered Provisional Immigrant Status (RPI) is December 31, 2011. Undocumented immigrants without serious criminal convictions have one year – which may be extended – to apply for RPI.
- An applicant’s spouse and children can be sponsored at the same time. There is no provision yet for same-sex couples.
- Those in RPI status may become eligible to apply for permanent resident status after 10 years, showing they have worked regularly, paid taxes, learned English and Civics. They must also pay a $100 penalty. After three years they may apply for citizenship.
- DREAMers may apply for residence in five years.
- Undocumented farm workers will become eligible for an agricultural card. They must pay taxes and a $400 fine. Their spouses and minor children can get derivative status.
- This was interesting to see: “The bill addresses the issue of families who have been separated through deportation. Undocumented immigrants who had been deported for non-criminal reasons but who had been in the U.S. before the end of 2011 can reapply to re-enter and apply for RPI status, if they are the spouse of or parent to a child who is a U.S. citizen or legal resident, or a Dreamer eligible for the DREAM Act.”
- The sibling of U.S. citizens category will be eliminated, but I am assuming that those who have already been petitioned will be grandfathered in.
- Adult children of U.S. citizens who are married and over 31 years old will also be eliminated.
- The “immediate relative” category, where a visa number is always available, will also have a change, but I am unclear what it is from the article.
- Those with doctorates in the science, math, engineering and technology (STEM) fields, will be exempted from annual visa limits, as well as qualified physicians and multi-national managers and executives.
- There will be a new startup visa for entrepreneurs.
- There will be a merit-based program with points for education and employment.
- The cap will increase to 110,000 for H1-B visas.
By Grace Alano
This week, the Senate is likely to introduce the comprehensive immigration reform bill. This post focuses on probationary legal status and visas for low-skilled workers, as those are two of the areas of comprehensive immigration reform that are the most fleshed-out so far. A discussion of how immigration reform will impact high-skilled workers and entrepreneurs will be in another post once there are more details.
PROBATIONARY LEGAL STATUS
The Senate Bipartisan Framework for Comprehensive Immigration Reform provides that the government will require people to initially register with them. The process will include passing a background check and paying a fine and back taxes, in order to earn probationary legal status. It is unclear what the amount of the fine will be. Probationary legal status will allow people who register to live and work legally in the United States. People with criminal backgrounds should consult with an attorney before attempting to apply, as the Bipartisan Framework has made clear that those with serious criminal backgrounds will be placed in deportation proceedings. Those in probationary legal status will not be able to access federal public benefits.
Individuals with probationary legal status “will be required to go to the back of the line of prospective immigrants, pass an additional background check, pay taxes, learn English and civics, demonstrate a history of work in the United States, and current employment, among other requirements, in order to earn the opportunity to apply for lawful permanent residency. Those individuals who successfully complete these requirements can eventually earn a green card.” Specifically, the senators have agreed to a 13-year path to citizenship. It would take 10 years for those in probationary legal status to get a green card, and then another three years to gain citizenship.
“DREAMers” – children brought into the U.S. when very young – and agricultural workers, will not have to wait in the same line – theirs will be shorter. The rationale is that as young children, they did not have the mental capacity to commit immigration violations. With regards to farm workers, there is a shortage of native-born U.S. workers who are willing and able to do farm work. Farm workers may be able to apply for resident status after five years.
What is unclear at this point is how people who do not have criminal convictions, but may have previously misrepresented themselves or committed some kind of fraud, may fare. Will it be possible for them to apply for probationary legal status, but 10 years down the line be unable to apply for residency? Will those people be able to apply for fraud waivers? These are still unanswered questions.
GUEST WORKER PROGRAM
There will be a new “W” visa for workers doing low-skill jobs. The W visa would affect housekeepers, landscapers, caregivers, retail workers and some construction workers. The visa program may possibly launch in April 2015. The number of visas issued would never go below 20,000 per year and could rise as high as 200,000 annually, depending on employment levels. In other words, they would rise and fall with the economy. One third of the visas would be reserved for businesses that employ fewer than 25 people, while no more than 15,000 visas per year would go to construction workers. The petition/application process is still unclear.
Photo by ttarasiuk.
By Grace Alano
Musical genius, British national treasure, humanitarian and peace activist John Lennon’s green card from July 1976. He fought deportation for four years because he believed in the American dream. He believed his deportation charges to be an abuse of the law and stemmed from his outspoken stance against the Vietnam War and Nixon administration.
For more on the background of his story, here is a trailer for The U.S. vs. John Lennon. His immigration file from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is available online, but I feel funny posting the link because it seems like an invasion of privacy – from me, anyway.
Photo from wcbsfm.cbslocal.com
From time to time I encounter a client reluctant to apply for a green card through marriage because he does not want his girlfriend to feel that he is marrying her for a green card. I also encounter clients who are married and not sure whether to get a green card through their spouses or through employment instead. So the client asks “Should I get a green card through marriage or employment?” Or, “Should I try to come back on another visa or marry this year instead of next so that we can be together?”
In the first scenario, the foreign national may be here in student status or another type of nonimmigrant status. He may be very serious about marrying his girlfriend. The couple has usually been talking about marriage for a while and there is no doubt that they will marry, however, the foreign national’s immigration status is expiring. The most obvious solution is to marry and apply for a marriage-based green card. A lot of times, the foreign national is hesitant to do so because he is worried that his girlfriend/fiancee and her family may think that he is using her. He may also feel too proud to do it, and would rather try to get immigrant status on his own.
In the second, the foreign national may already have been petitioned by an employer and may be waiting for a visa number to become current. She may have to wait several years, or may have already waited several years to be able to apply for residence through her employment. She and her boyfriend or fiance have discussed marriage or she has already married and they are wondering what to do.
The law says that it is your intent at the time that you marry that matters. You should be marrying because you intend to spend the rest of your lives together. You should not be marrying primarily to get a green card.
As a practical matter, it is much simpler to apply for permanent residence through marriage rather than through employment. One may granted residence through marriage in a few months rather than several years through employment. That is also assuming that you already have an employer petitioning you for both immigrant status and nonimmigrant status while you wait for a visa number.
Additionally, if you are work authorized through a marriage-based adjustment of status application, or can receive your residence faster through marriage, then you will have universal work authorization. That means that you will not be tied to your employer and can work anywhere you please or start your own business.
The bottom line is that you have to do what makes you and your fiancee feel comfortable. You should marry for love and should not feel rushed. You must also weigh the pros and cons of being separated if the foreign national has to leave the country because his or her status has ended, or the stress of feeling tied to an employer because your employer has petitioned you. Also realize that if your fiance(e) really loves you, he or she will be more than happy for you to get your green card through marriage rather than struggling to get it on your own. I have seen this firsthand.
Also, having practiced for many years, those are the couples that stay together.
Images by Grace Alano.
Try to establish a good rapport with your lawyer.
Remember that old saying, “You can catch more flies with honey…” But be sincere.
Promptly return your lawyer’s phone calls and emails.
It can help a lawyer’s workflow if a client is accessible when the lawyer needs information. Also, a simple, “Thanks, got it.” or “I’m working on it” reply email can save your lawyer from having to send follow up emails or voice mails. That, in turn, frees up his or her time to do more substantive work for you.
Be neat and organized with your documents.
Make photocopies of your documents and give it to your lawyer in a neat stack. Or send or upload PDFs. If you send PDFs, send them as one document. For example, if your lawyer needs your tax return, send all pages in one PDF, not as 20 separate PDFs for your lawyer to open and download.
It is much easier for your lawyer to send you documents and forms by email than by snail mail. It is cheaper, too. It will help keep your lawyer’s overhead down, which will keep prices down.
Don’t expect too much handholding.
It takes time away from allowing your lawyer to actually work on your case. Some lawyers will also charge you more for the extra time spent on your case.
Give your lawyer whatever paperwork he or she asks for, and do so in a timely manner.
Don’t complain about getting a document if you can get it. Don’t take six months to send it in.
Pay your invoices on time.
Paying your bills on time frees the lawyer from having to follow up on payment.
Photo by Kozumel.